The Myth That Wouldn't Die!!!

Comments

The myth never will die, Scott. It is something that is necessary to those who want to cling to victimhood, to prove how "strong" they are.

After all, if evil misogynistic pig creators (and fans) weren't the problem for "fangirl (and boy) feminists" in this industry, and it was shown to be something they themselves would have to be responsible for changing, or something that it was something like their own lack of support for series and companies who try to cater to what they claim to want, but fail to do so, well, that would just cause their whole universe to shatter.

I go back to what Chris Rock's character said in Dogma. He said, basically, that it is easy to change an idea, but not so easy to change a belief. Because an idea is simply a concept that must standup to the scrutiny of rational thought and the subjective nature of reality, while belief is fueled by faith and doesn't need to prove any such thing.

That's what the "80% of all female characters in superhero comics have been raped" myth is. Not and idea or theory, but a belief. It is one that is often felt to be a self-evident truth, which is thereby irrefutable. This is why, no matter what prove you (and others) have brought to the table to disprove such notions, the myth still persists. And, my friend, I'm afraid it always will. At least, so long as being a "victim" is seen as a means to obtain power.

I half agree with you, James. For some people, there really does seem to be some kind of faith in victimhood that has them clinging to obvious falsehoods; however, for many people, I think this rape in comics myth is like an urban legend. They believe it because someone told them it was true and it felt right. No one has taken the time to tell them otherwise. I know I thought the whole women in refrigerators things was true until I really took at look at Gail's list and saw the numerous flaws in it.

Hmm. You know, looking at the list above, I may have to take Miss Martian off the not raped list because she kind of sexually assaulted herself when one of her personalities set her up for a sexual experience in a restroom with 2 guys since the time I originally made this list. It's a little hard to categorize that one.

So, what percentage of male comic book characters have been raped?

So, what percentage of male comic book characters have been raped?

We looked at that too and I forget the numbers and if I wasn't feeling really lazy right now, I could probably dig them up. What we discovered was that while male characters were sexually assaulted significantly less than female characters, the difference in the rates in comics were roughly the same as they are in real life, that is that men are raped less than women at about the same rate in comics as they are in real life. If I'm remembering correctly, the rate of male characters being raped was slightly higher than it should have been if the rates in comics were exactly equal to those in real life but the difference was so slight and the sample was so small that it really couldn't be said that there was evidence that writers were overplaying the rape of men in comics.

I've argued that I don't think it would be a good idea for men to be raped in comics at levels that are higher than they are in real life because it might send a message that homosexuals are likely to be rapists or that women are more likely to be rapists than they really are. Evidence suggests that rapists are overwhelmingly men and that gay rapists are really rare so raping more men in comics seems like it would stereotype those groups in ways that I don't think we really want.

OK, I got a burst of energy and found the old post of mine with this discussion. It is here: http://blog.360.yahoo.com/blog-NYapGagiRKXkibx6bHvcaBbV36Q-?cq=1&p=88

Thanks! Very helpful. I haven't really kept up with my comics reading over the last five years so it's hard for me to evaluate your numbers, but your approach seems sensible and I appreciate that you're looking at both men and women. It's hard to evaluate the numbers for rape in men because they are even more likely to underreport than women, plus a lot of men are abused as children and depending on which numbers you look at, it doesn't always get included in ways that make sense - but it doesn't seem way off from the numbers you cite. Much appreciated.
I don't think it should matter whether rape was the reason a female character was inspired to become a hero. The point is that rape is a horrific thing to happen, and when taken in context with other forms of violence, the rate of women vs. men following a heroic path after some sort of assault is still markedly skewed high for the women.

It's one thing to have realistic motivations, and real life is a pretty messed up place to be, but it's another thing to be so willing to frequently sacrifice
women on the altar of "but it's a good plot!" It's not only female heroes, but supporting characters, girlfriends, family members of heroes that are tortured, mutilated, or killed.

I know that this post was more in response to one blogger's assertion that all empowered females are motivated by a past rape, but really. Trivializing misogyny is as bad as overemphasizing it.

Trivializing misogyny is as bad as overemphasizing it.

Well, I just hope you are as concerted with your efforts to those who overemphasize it, as you were here with Scott's efforts to put it more into perspective.

Somehow, though, the cynic in me doubts that.

I have no problem in admitting that the ones who overemphasize it are much less rational and willing to listen than the ones who trivialize it. But hey, if the cynic in you likes to think that I don't try to engage people taking both ends of the spectrum in conversation, I probably can't change your mind about that either.

I have no problem in admitting that the ones who overemphasize it are much less rational and willing to listen than the ones who trivialize it. But hey, if the cynic in you likes to think that I don't try to engage people taking both ends of the spectrum in conversation, I probably can't change your mind about that either.

Sure you can. Just supply a link to somewhere, that shows you engaging with one of these "less rational overemphasizers" the same way you did with scott here. That would surely make me believe you are as fair across the board about things as you claimed. And it doesn't seem like it should be a very difficult theng to do.

I am a cynic, though, because from the experiences I've seen and had, when someone comes to confront Scott (or someone who thinks like him) on issues like this, they rarely, if ever, do so with the opposite side of the spectrum, despite whatever claims they may make otherwise. Still, if you do so, it shouldn't be a problem for you to supply a link to somewhere in which you did so. I may be a cynic, but even I can't deny proof that is present right before my own eyes. I hope to see your proof very soon. :)

the rate of women vs. men following a heroic path after some sort of assault is still markedly skewed high for the women.

That may be. Can you tell me what the rate is for women v. men? I suspect you haven't actually counted them up, but if you have, I'd be really interested in seeing your research.


It's not only female heroes, but supporting characters, girlfriends, family members of heroes that are tortured, mutilated, or killed.

I take it from this statement that you believe that male characters are not tortured, mutilated, or killed as often as female characters. Can you show me some research that suggests that because when I look at comics, I see a lot of male characters being tortured, mutilate, or killed that doesn't seem to be visible to many readers as if the t, m, or k isn't meaingful or isn't unexpected when it comes to male characters. For instance, in the Avengers Disassembled storyline, I saw a lot of people complain about what happened to the Scarlet Witch without seeming to notice the deaths of Hawkeye, Ant Man, Jack of Hearts, and the Vision. Are you sure female characters are disproportionately t, m, or k?


I know that this post was more in response to one blogger's assertion that all empowered females are motivated by a past rape, but really. Trivializing misogyny is as bad as overemphasizing it.

If you see anyone trivializing misogyny, please let me know. However, the t, m or k of a comic character is not necessarily evidence of misogyny or misandry. But if you have evidence of misogyny in comics, please let me know about it so that I can protest it.

But if you have evidence of misogyny in comics, please let me know about it so that I can protest it.

I'm still waiting for her to supply a link where she chastises one of the "overemphasizers," the way she did you right here, Scott. My "cynic-sense" is tingling, though, which means we are both probably in for a very long wait... provided we ever get the evidence we asked for. ;)

My "cynic-sense" is tingling, though, which means we are both probably in for a very long wait... provided we ever get the evidence we asked for. ;)

I'd love for someone to provide the evidence of it. We talked about doing a study on the Gay League boards, but it would have taken a lot of work. I suspect that what we'd find is that all characters regardless of gender (or race) are tortured, mutilated, or killed eventually. I mean is there any character who has been around for a while who hasn't at least been tortured? While I was responding to the comment, I was reading The Essential Marvel Horror II and 5 of the 6 male protagonists had torture, mutilation, and/or murder as central elements of their origins stories. Some of it was quite gruesome. Gabriel the Devil Hunter was possessed and forced to rip out his own eye. He then got the devil out of him by a pulling a metal cross out of a fire with his bare hands and using it to sear a scar into his chest. But as I said, it seems as if the violence that happens to men in comics is invisible. It's so common that some people don't even see it. It is without meaning while acts against women are full of meaning. Strange.

But as I said, it seems as if the violence that happens to men in comics is invisible. It's so common that some people don't even see it. It is without meaning while acts against women are full of meaning. Strange.

Oh, I don't think it's so strange. I think that, despite what we hear to the contrary, women do want to be seen and treated as "special." Oh, not so special in the way that prevents them from doing something they want, or having something done their way, but special, in that, people take them and what happens to them more seriosuly, than what happens to men.

You said that the violence to men in superhero comics is virtually invisible and I think that is a very accurate observation. I notice you don't see many of the women who complain about the violence towards superhero comic book women, say that violence and torture is just wrong entirely. It is only when it is a female character that the complaint comes out (and even then, usually only if they like that character). That says to me that they actually enjoy (or have no real problem with) the violence in superhero comics, per say, just when it is directed at a female character (especially one they like). So, it isn't the violence they seem to object to, so much as the gender of the character upon which it is inflicted. It is a form of hypocrsy and/or double standard, that has long been one of the things that has never allowed me to take such complaints seriously.

All of which is only compounded by the fact that these same women say they don't want special treatment, or to be seen differently, yet their words and actions on this matter clearly shows that they do. Perhaps they don't realize themselves how much they seem to want to be seen as "special" in certain circumstances, because of the societial views on such thing. I can't really say. But it a big part of what has always made me view such complaints less as a "problem in society" and more as "overbearing fan entitlement."

If violence and torture are simply "wrong," then it shouldn't matter what the gender of the character is. But, very obviously, for many of these women, it does matter. Violence against women is evil. Violence against men is simply expected. So much for "equality," right? ;)

Post a comment

Already a Vox member? Sign in

Scott (The Mad Thinker)

About Me

Scott (The Mad Thinker)
United States
"Actually, evidence suggests that the opposite is true."
Messaging:
Send

My Groups

Archives

Are You a Potential Super Villain?