The Bible Ruins Everything
Victoria Jackson is making Republicans look ridiculous ... again and not just because of what she’s wearing. But what she is wearing is nonsensically wrong for a news show where you’re trying to be persuasive. It’s like she looked in her closet and thought, “Hmm, should I dress in business casual or frowsy clown college dropout?”
After telling us that Obama will punish her if she’s successful (Trust me, Victoria, if that were true, you’d still be perfectly safe), she informs us that the problem with America is that it doesn’t have enough Biblical influence. I find this to be particularly galling. Even a casual look around will tell you that the Bible is not the answer to a country’s problems. America has the highest rate of church-going and the highest rate of murder of the industrialized nations. Countries with few Christians like Japan aren’t backward, crime-filled nations. And even rates of religion within the US don’t suggest that the Bible is the answer to problems.
I compared a Gallup poll on the importance of religion (here) with the rates of crime in the states (here) and found that in all areas of crime, the states were religion was more important had higher crime rates than the states where religion was less important. Comparing the top 10 most religious states with the bottom 10, I found that on average the states that were the most religious had rates of crime higher than those that were the least religious. In the most religious states:
Rape was 2.3% more frequent.
Robbery was 13.3% more frequent.
Violent crime was 16.0% more frequent.
Property crime was 22.8% more frequent.
Murder was a whopping 27.9% more frequent.
Crime may not be the problem that Victoria Jackson is concerned with. We have real economic problems too. But guess what? Not only doesn’t religion appear to turn people’s hearts toward moral action, it doesn’t seem to stop poverty. I compared the top and bottom 10 most religious states with their rank in poverty found on a nifty interactive map (here.) Note that 7 (70%) of the most religious states rank in the top 10 for poverty while none of the less religious are. The least religious boast 5 of the 10 states with the least poverty.
Most Religious
Mississippi 1st
Alabama 10th
South Carolina 12th
Tennessee 11th
Louisiana 3rd
Arkansas 5th
Georgia 13th
Oklahoma (tie) 7th
Kentucky (tie) 7th
Texas 9th
Least Religious
Vermont (tie) 41st
New Hampshire 50th
Maine 24th
Massachusetts 43rd
Alaska 39th
Washington 32nd
Oregon 21st
Rhode Island 35th
Nevada (tie) 41st
Connecticut 49th
All right, but maybe Victoria Jackson wasn’t talking about worldly things. Maybe she’s referring to the blessings of the Holy Spirit, the comforting grace of God, and joy that only true salvation brings. Certainly, the most religious states are the happiest, right? Not so much. I compared the rankings of happiness from the poll that was conducted (here), and it turns out that on average the highly religious states rank about 17 places down from the least religious states in happiness. Below are their rakings. Note that not one of the religious states is even in the top 20 while 7 (70%) of the least religious are.
Most Religious
Mississippi 48th
Alabama 33rd
South Carolina 26th
Tennessee 42nd
Louisiana 40th
Arkansas 46th
Georgia 23rd
Oklahoma 43rd
Kentucky 49th
Texas 21st
Least Religious
Vermont 14th
New Hampshire 13th
Maine 29th
Massachusetts 8th
Alaska 20th
Washington 7th
Oregon 18th
Rhode Island 37th
Nevada 38th
Connecticut 19th
There is absolutely no doubt in my mind that many of the problems in the highly religious states can be explained by the geography and history of the South. Still, I don’t know that we can completely discount the role of religion in making the most religious states worse off than the least religious. The religious are more likely to marry and have children early, hindering them from getting higher education. They are more likely to get divorced, which creates those single parent homes they are so worried about. (Single parent homes have been strongly linked to higher rates of crime and poverty.) They are less likely to use birth control. They are more suspicious of education. They are more likely to believe they can pray their way to wealth, which might keep them from doing things that actually create wealth. They are more likely to be opposed to abortion. (Lowering the rate of abortion has been linked to an increase of poverty and crime.) They are more likely to limit their talent pools by excluding, overtly or covertly, lgbt people from their communities. In short, religion increases several of the behaviors that are likely to decrease wealth and increase crime.
So when Victoria Jackson and her ilk suggest that the Bible will help America, what the hell does she mean?
Comments
I'm gonna have to neighbour you now, as I have no sound at work and I really want to hear what Victoria has to say!
See, I think when people say that America needs more Bible, they mean that the Bible helps in this world, that it makes this world better. America doesn't exist in heaven. If someone says that faith in Biblical ideas will get you to heaven, there isn't much to argue about there. You either believe that or you don't. But when they say that America needs more Bible, they seem to be saying that it is going against Biblical principles that messes up a state, and for that I think the evidence is in and the Bible just doesn't cut it as an aide to a nation or state.
a) Genetics did not bless her vocally
b) Fox News tells the truth? What?
c) Obama wants to be Castro - an even bigger wtf for that one.
And then I just lost the will to listen.
As education drops people will turn to religion and that is a scary thing.
I wonder what the USA would look like if churches took it over?
Well lets take a look at how its working in other parts of the world.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-452288/The-moment-teenage-girl-stoned-death-loving-wrong-boy.html
One man asks
"She was only a child, a human being, a daughter - how could any single person do this to her? How could a group do it? How could they justify it?"
Answer: God
Well that is there god not MY god you say? Yah right.
Deuteronomy 13:6-9
6 If your very own brother, or your son or daughter, or the wife you love, or your closest friend secretly entices you, saying, "Let us go and worship other gods" (gods that neither you nor your fathers have known, 7 gods of the peoples around you, whether near or far, from one end of the land to the other), 8 do not yield to him or listen to him. Show him no pity. Do not spare him or shield him. 9 You must certainly put him to death. Your hand must be the first in putting him to death, and then the hands of all the people
You know maybe they just misunderstand the meaning of whatever law it was right? Kinda like I totally am missing the point of this law.
The thing that really pisses me off the most about the bible is how know one really reads the damn thing. They pick out a few fun verses, pat themselves on the back for being good children of god then blame all the ugliness of the world on people not being as wise or a penitent as themselves.
It's possible that she's not being serious, but on her own site she talks about going to ultra conservative meetings and she suggests that Obama might be the anti-Christ. Or at least she did. I just checked and she deleted the craziest stuff. If she's pulling a hoax, she has been doing a remarkable job at staying in character for about a year now. Jaoquine Phoenix could learn something from her.
About my writing, I once wrote a friend of mine about this red-headed girl who had a crush on me and who couldn't take a hint. I wrote something like, "She keeps sagging her red body over my shoulder while I'm trying to study." My friend wrote back, "You have a way of writing that makes things sound terrible. I guess that's good." I guess that's true.