Hey, Bitch! Stop Making Feminists Look Stupid!

Comments

But knee-jerk ranting and raving is just so much more fun than actually, you know, knowing what you're talking about. Like, one could take that list you came up with and say "see, all these women were killed with little regard and then brought back to life anyway! It was all just done for shock value!"

That right there would be an actual point, and not just some silly rant.

"But knee-jerk ranting and raving is just so much more fun than actually, you know, knowing what you're talking about."

John, I know you were only half serious about this, but I think it is actually more true than you know. Snark would seem to be the new language for the "Internet generation."

In the recent dust ups that Valerie D'Orazio has had with Kevin Huxford and the WFA gals are just the latest in a long string of examples of such behavior. But what is even worse is the vultures who come in to stir the pot some more. Like the piece Johanna Draper Calrson did about said dust ups.

The most telling line in her entry? "Because I love drama when it happens to other people." I think that pretty much sums up a lot of folks in the news and journalism business in general, nowadays.

I think Scott gives the author here a bit too much credit in doing the "theory before research" thing, as a means to help feminism through underhanded means. I really don't think they even get that far. They are looking for what will generate circulation (or hit count, in terms of online publications). And nothing does that better than "outrage and controversy." Even if the one being produced isn't really what reality knows it to be.

I can see the author and editor even now, finding the WiR list and saying how it would make a great angle to talk about sexism in superhero comics and the struggles women face in that genre. That's as far as any real research goes. the rest is merely taking a few statisics and letting the anger and outrage of the readers fuel the controversy from there. True, it is yellow journalism at it's worst, but this is hardly anything new.

This is also what you see done by many bloggers, too. Yellow journalism tactics to attract larger readership, even if they are playing fast and loose with the realities of the topic under examination. And while the reasons of just why they do it (i.e., they like drama with other people, they have personal axes to grind, they care about their "truth" over the real thing, ect.), the fact remains the tactics are always the same.

Scott is completely correct that these "so-called feminists" are sullying the reputation of feminisim (and doing more to keep people from wanting to be associated with it, more than anything anti-feminists could ever hope to do). But many true feminists seem willing to turn that blind eye to those types and thier tactics, because as reprehensible as they are, they are giving feminism the one thing they want it to have: more people's attention. I'm sure they figure they can clean up the muck created by those types later, but they fail to see the damage will have already been done by then.

As long as feminists allow themselves to believe that being seen as victims is the only worthwhile way to get the attention they crave, don't expect things to change.

Post a comment

Already a Vox member? Sign in

Scott (The Mad Thinker)

About Me

Scott (The Mad Thinker)
United States
"Actually, evidence suggests that the opposite is true."
Messaging:
Send

My Groups

Archives

Are You a Potential Super Villain?